Unique 
    Catholic 
    Mormon 
    SDA 
    JW 
    British Israel 
    Church 
    of Christ 
    Pentecostal 
      Preliminary 
      Strategy 
      Mark
    16:17-18 
      Romans
    5:6,8 
      1
    Cor. 14:2 
    IslamCommon 
    Trinity 
    Soul 
    Heaven 
    Hell 
    Satan/Demons 
    "Saved" 
    Baptism 
    Resurrection 
    Antichrist 
    Science 
    Miracles 
    Evolution 
    Creation 
    Carbon
    Dating 
    Inspiration 
    Partial 
    Contradictions 
    & Inaccuracies   | 
    
      - 1 Corinthians 14:2
 
          
      - "For he that speaketh in an unknown tongue speaketh not unto men, but unto God: for
        no man understandeth him; howbeit in the spirit he speaketh mysteries."
 
          
      - Problem:
 
          
      - Pentecostal "speaking in tongues"1 is unintelligible speech uttered
        in a state of religious fervour. The justification for this practice is sought in this
        passage.
 
          
      - Solution: 
 
     
    
      - The tongues referred to in this passage are not unknown. The word "unknown" is
        not in the Greek text and is deleted in the R.S.V. (This is also indicated by the printing
        of "unknown" in italics in the A.V.).
 
          
      - Pentecostals sometimes argue that since "glossa" (the Greek word for speech)
        is used in this verse, rather than "dialektos" (the Greek word for language),
        that the unintelligible utterance is intended. This argument is shown to be invalid by the
        following: 
          - "Glossa" and "dialektos" are used interchangeably in Scripture. In
            Acts 2:4 the word for "tongues" is "glossa" but in verse 8 the word
            for "tongues" is "dialektos" (translated "language", R.S.V.)
          
 
          - "Glossa" refers to foreign languages in the following passages: Rev. 5:9; 7:9;
            10:11; 11:9; 13:7; 14:6; 17:15. "Glossa" also means intelligible speech in the
            following passages: Rom. 14:11; Phil. 2:11; 1 Jn. 3:18.
 
              
         
       
      - When the disciples spoke in tongues as recorded in Acts 2, fifteen languages or dialects
        were spoken. Every man heard them speak in his own language. (Acts 2:7,8). Galilean
        fisherman could speak the language of the Elamites although the language had never been
        the subject of study. But Pentecostal meetings are characterized by unintelligible speech,
        not foreign languages which have been unlearned.
 
          
      - In 1 Cor. 14, the following differences from Pentecostal practice are noteworthy: 
          - Pentecostal women usually predominate in unintelligible utterances2 and even
            preach during public assemblies.3
            But Paul says, "Let your women keep silence in the churches: for it is not permitted
            unto them to speak; but they are commanded to be under obedience, as also saith the law. And if they will learn any thing, let them ask their husbands at home:
            for it is a shame for women to speak in the church." (1 Cor. 14:34,35).4 
 
          - Pentecostal meetings frequently have more than one person uttering unintelligible sounds
            at the same time, but Paul instructs that all things should be done "decently and in
            order" (1 Cor. 14:40), and that "if any man speak in an unknown tongue, let it
            be by two, or at the most by three, and that by course . . . " (1 Cor. 14:27). 
 
          - Pentecostals seldom have any "interpreter" of the unintelligible speech, yet
            Paul says, "let one interpret. But if there be no interpreter, let him keep silence
            in the church . . . " (1 Cor. 14:27,28).  
 
          - Many Pentecostals consider themselves compelled by the Holy Spirit to "speak
            in tongues"5 yet Paul says,
            "the spirits of the prophets are subject tot he prophets." (1 Cor. 14:32).
 
              
         
       
      - It is also appropriate to cite Paul's instruction to the Corinthians: "If any man
        think himself to be a prophet, or spiritual, let him acknowledge that the things that I
        write unto you are the commandments of the Lord." (1 Cor. 14:37).
 
          
      - It is also relevant to emphasize that "glossalalia" occurs among those who
        practice voodoo in Haiti. It is not, therefore, a phenomenon peculiarly
        "Christian". This indicates that explanations other than God's Holy Spirit can
        account for "glossalalia". It is also noteworthy that "glossalalia" is
        now being practised by other denominations including Anglicans and Roman Catholics.6 Do
        Pentecostals believe these religious bodies hold the truth of the Gospel? This point is
        especially forceful when it is recognize that speaking in tongues is understood by
        Pentecostals as an initial sign of Holy Spirit baptism. 
 
     
     
     Footnotes:  
      - More technically the phenomenon is referred to as "glossalalia" from
        "glossa" - tongue, and "lalia" - to speak or talk with. Return
 
          
      - Many writers have noted this. Bryan Wilson at one meeting
        counted twenty-five instances of glossalalia in one assembly, of which twenty-four were
        women. He noted that usually three-quarters of the audience consisted of women, and never
        much less than two-thirds. "In Pentecostal meetings, women tend to give vent to
        pent-up feelings - in tears, heavy breathing, groans, utterances of joy and rapture, and,
        of course, tongues." See Bryan Wilson, Sects and Society: A sociological Study
        of Three Religious Groups in Britain, (London: William Heinemann Ltd.), pp. 302-303. Return
 
          
      - For example, Allen commenting on his "miracle revival"
        in Naga City, in Southern Luzon states: "Sister Rogers preached a salvation message
        to a fine crowd each afternoon . . ." See Miracle Magazine, 14, No. 9, (June,
        1969), p. 17. Return
 
           
      
      - Pentecostal preachers tend to disregard the Apostle's instruction by a casual dismissal
        on the grounds that the church must "move with the times". It is noteworthy that
        the Apostle's reason for this instruction is not founded on culturally relative grounds,
        but rather on the fall of Eve. (Cf. 1 Tim. 2:11-15). Return
 
          
      - In recent years within the Elim movement there is an opposite
        point of view - that tongues may deter possible converts. Speakers in tongues at revival
        meetings have often been silenced. A. A. Allen comments: "It's little wonder that
        many Pentecostal preachers today will not have speaking in tongues in their main assembly
        and under their tent. Too much of it sounds too downright silly, too obvious that it isn't
        genuine. It isn't real." Miracle Magazine, 14. No. 9, (June, 1969), p. 11. Return
 
          
      - That the gifts can be abused or imitated is acknowledged by some
        Pentecostals. A. A. Allen comments as follows: "I wouldn't give you two cents for
        what you call a Holy Ghost experience, if the only action you got was a few minutes of
        stammering lips: "Bla, bla, bib, gah, gah, goo!" My children said that when they
        were six months old! I have seen people do that when they are drunk . . . I have seen many
        people whom I believe were merely 'trained' by those who prayed with them, to seemingly
        receive the Holy Ghost . . . I believe some Pentecostal denominations are full of people
        who have never received the baptism in the Holy Ghost experience. They have just been
        patted on the back and shook on the chin, and told what to say, until they couldn't say
        anything but, "Bla, bla, gag, gag, goo!" And then somebody said, 'You've got
        it!' The only action they got was when somebody shook them under the chin!' "The Book
        of Acts is Holy Ghost in Action", Miracle Magazine, 14, No. 9 (June, 1969), p.
        10. Return
 
     
     |